From Think Progress. This is a must-read post on the state of the climate after what has for most of us been a warm winter:
We've been Through Climate Changes Before: But Mostly Cold Ones And Mostly In Our Far Distant Past
Showing posts with label Environmentalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environmentalism. Show all posts
Monday, March 12, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Dolphins as Persons
Someone on Google+ shared this link of a lecture by a professor at UNC-Asheville, Dr. Eggers, who discusses the personhood of dolphins (and other cetaceans). It's a wonderful talk and I highly recommend it:
I remember, in his 1999 book Dependent Rational Animals, that Catholic philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre broached this subject about dolphins as well, so this was not news to me. I'm also interested in the personhood of elephants, another species that has become a victim of human technological killing efficiency.
I remember, in his 1999 book Dependent Rational Animals, that Catholic philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre broached this subject about dolphins as well, so this was not news to me. I'm also interested in the personhood of elephants, another species that has become a victim of human technological killing efficiency.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
A Star Trek World is Impossible
Here's a disturbing quote from a brief but good article, Making Sense of 7 Billion People:
As you can see, I'm still a humanist at heart. Part of the reason I am think more about civil liberties than the environment is because I am resigned to the fact that governments are bought by corporations and that little headway will be made on the environmental front for some time. We live in a capitalist world, where profit drives policy. Mother Earth has a disease and I'm not that hopeful that we can cure it before we do even more serious damage.
On the other hand, environmental and social policy are intimately bound up with each other. Perhaps the way toward a more stable and enduring human freedom is through ecology. But it's hard to believe that such a world is possible with capitalism as we now have it in all parts of the world.
But the fact remains that, for all humanity to experience a material standard of living now enjoyed by a tiny fraction, we'd need four more Earths. It's just not possible. And that, in the end, is the significance of 7 billion people. It's a challenge.Although I am very appreciative of the amazing advances of technology even in my lifetime (I'm in my 30s), I could live without much of it. What worries me is that a world in which wars are being fought over scarce resources is one in which freedom will no longer be possible. We already have seen how our need for oil has led to endless conflict in the Middle East, where I think most of it realize we have no business. What will it be like in 20 or 30 years? We have plenty of coal, but that's environmentally still a disaster compared to other fossil fuels, or so is my understanding, especially in places without the wherewithal or political will to design cleaner plants (hi, China!). And I don't hold out much hope for renewable energy resources, though perhaps big advances are coming in the next decade or two (but isn't that always the refrain?).
As you can see, I'm still a humanist at heart. Part of the reason I am think more about civil liberties than the environment is because I am resigned to the fact that governments are bought by corporations and that little headway will be made on the environmental front for some time. We live in a capitalist world, where profit drives policy. Mother Earth has a disease and I'm not that hopeful that we can cure it before we do even more serious damage.
On the other hand, environmental and social policy are intimately bound up with each other. Perhaps the way toward a more stable and enduring human freedom is through ecology. But it's hard to believe that such a world is possible with capitalism as we now have it in all parts of the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)